US Clinical Trial NCT03951831

Phase II, Open-label, Single-center Study Evaluating Safety and Activity of Androgen Deprivation Therapy Followed by Chemoimmunotherapy for Newly Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer (mHSPC)  May 14, 2019

The slow progress for notable trials in metastatic, hormone-sensitive disease is attributed to the long duration of follow-up required, as well as the focus on time-to-event end points, i.e. overall survival, in clinical trial design. These landmark trials (CHAARTED, STAMPEDE, LATITUDE), which used overall survival as their endpoints, required, on average, 10 years from start of trial to first peer-reviewed publication. Given the challenge of using traditional measures of response (RECIST criteria) when designing prostate cancer clinical trials, the Prostate Cancer Working group 2 (PCWG2) made trial-design recommendations. One was to separate treatment outcomes into early measures of response and later time-to-event measures of progression. The goal is to shift the trial objective to capture and reflect the actual effect of the tested treatment and, in doing so, provide a more timely drug development milieu for the metastatic patient. These early measure of response end points, such as undetectable PSA with testosterone recovery, are now being actively integrated into clinical trial design.


Cancer Chemoimmunotherapy Prostate Cancer Prostate Cancer Metastatic

JSON preview

Similar records


Source:  NIH Last updated:  Jun 12, 2019

From, a database of the U.S. National Institutes of Health, through its National Library of Medicine. This record may not reflect the most current and accurate biomedical/scientific data available from the NLM/NIH.